![]() |
|||||||||||
|
PROTECTING THE VULNERABLE
One of the key features of self regulation is the special protection afforded to particularly vulnerable groups of people by the Code of Practice. This protection exists over and above that afforded by the law. These groups include children, patients in hospitals, victims of sexual assault, innocent friends of those convicted of crime, people suffering at times of grief and shock, and individuals at risk of discrimination. Some of the ways in which the Code works to protect the vulnerable were illustrated by a number of important decisions by the Commission in 1998. Among recent upheld complaints were these.
A local newspaper's report of a Court case included
details of a rape victim which potentially contributed
to her identification. The Commission ruled that although
no individual detail in the newspaper report would on
its own have identified the victim, taken together the
details (all of which were made available in a Court
case) might have done so. This adjudication illustrates
the way in which the terms of the Code do more to protect
victims than the law does.
A national Sunday newspaper intruded into a man's privacy
by identifying him as the step-brother of a contract
killer. The man was completely unaware of his brother's
activities, and the Commission ruled that the story
could have been written without identifying the complainant.
A Scottish newspaper intruded into the shock of man
whose niece had died before he had officially been told
of it. The Commission used the adjudication to remind
all editors that it is not the job of reporters to break
the news of a death to the family or friends of the
person involved.
A local newspaper intruded into the privacy of a child
by outlining his medical condition, which had been mentioned
during a Court case. The adjudication made clear that
the Code exists to afford protection to the vulnerable
even where material is in the public domain: in this
case, the complainant's teenage son, particularly in
view of his medical background, was such a vulnerable
person and his medical details should have been omitted.
A magazine intruded into the privacy of a well known
celebrity by publishing pictures of him worshipping
in a Cathedral after the death of his wife. The Commission
ruled that the pictures were clearly taken in a place
'where there is a reasonable expectation of privacy'
and underlined that all journalists should respect the
sanctity of individuals' acts of worship.
A national newspaper made pejorative references to a
man's religion by describing him as 'silken tongued'
and contained an irrelevant reference to the fact that
he was Jewish. The Commission did not believe the reference
to the man's religion had any relevance to the short
profile, and that a number of references were clearly
pejorative.
All these complaints - which are drawn to the attention of all editors through the Commission's quarterly bulletin - have helped further to raise standards of reporting and to give increased protection to vulnerable people.
The Commission continues to work with a number of those
groups involved in mental health to improve the way
in which those suffering mental illness are portrayed
in the media. To that end, the Commission joined in
the launch of MIND's 'Campaign to Complain' at its Annual
Conference in September 1998 - at which a number of
representatives of the PCC explained the Code and the
work of the Commission.
As set out in this Report, the Commission goes to considerable
length to ensure its services are as well know as possible
to those in need. We therefore provide a special service
for deaf and hard of hearing persons, for those whose
first language is not English, and for people who are
blind or have difficulty in seeing. The Commission's
staff is always available to give advice and to assist
people in making complaints.
|
|||||||||||
| [Prev] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [Next] |


