Press Complaints Commission
spacer spacer
SEARCH FOR     Or try the cases search  
See the search help for assistance in using this tool

Search Results For: privacy (335 Results Found)
 
arrow_right First | arrow_right Prev | Now displaying 11 - 20 | arrow_right Next | arrow_right Last
(11)A man (The Sunday Times)

A man complained to the Press Complaints Commission that an article headlined 'Farm inspector sacked after anti-cull tweets', published in The Sunday Times on 29 September 2013, intruded into his private life in breach of Clause 3 (Privacy) and was inaccurate in breach of Clause 1 (Accuracy) of the Editors' Code of Practice.

(12)Two employees of RBS's Global Restructuring Group (The Daily Telegraph)

Two employees of the Royal Bank of Scotland's Global Restructuring Group complained to the Press Complaints Commission that articles headlined 'Listen: RBS team argue with small business holders in conference call' and 'RBS, the fight for survival and a legacy of bitterness who cried foul', published on the website of The Daily Telegraph on 25 November 2013, intruded into their privacy in breach of Clause 3 (Privacy) of the Editors' Code of Practice and contained information obtained using subterfuge in breach of Clause 10 (Clandestine devices and subterfuge) of the Code.

(13)Julie Johnson (The Echo (Basildon))

Julie Johnson complained to the Press Complaints Commission that an article headlined 'Dad jailed for 21st birthday wishes to son', published by The Echo (Basildon) on 7 June 2013, was inaccurate in breach of Clause 1 (Accuracy) and intrusive in breach of Clause 3 (Privacy) of the Editors' Code of Practice.

(14)Press Complaints Commission (Sunday World)

In December 2013, the Press Complaints Commission upheld a complaint from June McKibbin, via solicitors, against the Sunday World newspaper. The Commission has now issued a further rebuke to the newspaper for its failure to publish this ruling in compliance with the requirements set out in the Editors' Code of Practice.

(15)Ms June McKibbin (Sunday World)

Ms June McKibbin complained to the Press Complaints Commission, via solicitors, that an article headlined 'Deadly duo...woman knows who killed my brother', published by the Sunday World on 16 June 2013, had intruded into her private life in breach of Clause 3 (Privacy) of the Editors' Code of Practice.

(16)Dr Nicholas Russell (Daily Mirror)

Dr Nicholas Russell complained to the Press Complaints Commission, with the consent of his brother Judge Anthony Russell QC, that an article headlined 'Stuart Hall judge visited gay brothel', published by the Daily Mirror on 24 June 2013, had discriminated against the Judge and intruded into his privacy in breach of Clause 12 (Discrimination) and Clause 3 (Privacy) of the Editors' Code of Practice.

(17)A man v The Bolton News (The Bolton News)

A man complained to the Press Complaints Commission that an article published in The Bolton News in March 2013 was intrusive in breach of Clause 3 (Privacy) and had identified him in breach of Clause 14 (Confidential sources) of the Editors' Code of Practice.

(18)A woman (Hemel Hempstead Gazette)

A woman complained to the Press Complaints Commission that an article published by the Hemel Hempstead Gazette had breached Clause 6 (Children) and Clause 3 (Privacy) of the Editors' Code of Practice.

(19)Alexandra and Georgia Pryce (The Daily Telegraph)

Alexandra and Georgia Pryce complained to the Press Complaints Commission, with the consent of their mother Ms Vicky Pryce, that a photograph of Ms Pryce published by The Daily Telegraph on 21 March intruded into her private life in breach of Clause 3 (Privacy) and Clause 4 (Harassment) of the Editors' Code of Practice.

(20)Mr Chris Huhne and Ms Carina Trimingham (The Sun)

Mr Chris Huhne and Ms Carina Trimingham complained to the Press Complaints Commission through solicitors that a photograph of Ms Trimingham published on the website and in the print edition of The Sun on 31 March, and a photograph of Mr Huhne published on the website and in the print edition of the newspaper on 1 April, along with the articles they accompanied, were in breach of Clause 3 (Privacy) of the Editors' Code of Practice.



Home ] Cases ] Site map ]