Press Complaints Commission
spacer spacer
SEARCH FOR     Or try the cases search  
See the search help for assistance in using this tool

Search Results For: privacy (335 Results Found)
 
arrow_right First | arrow_right Prev | Now displaying 21 - 30 | arrow_right Next | arrow_right Last
(21)Mr Chris Huhne and Ms Carina Trimingham (The Daily Telegraph)

Mr Chris Huhne and Ms Carina Trimingham complained to the Press Complaints Commission through solicitors that a photograph of Mr Huhne and a photograph of Ms Trimingham published on the website and in the print edition of The Daily Telegraph on 1 April 2, along with the articles they accompanied, and a photograph of Mr Huhne with Ms Trimingham published on its website on 5 May and in the print edition on 6 May, breached Clause 3 (Privacy) of the Editors' Code of Practice.

(22)Mr Chris Huhne and Ms Carina Trimingham (Daily Mail)

Mr Chris Huhne and Ms Carina Trimingham complained to the Press Complaints Commission through solicitors that a photograph of Mr Huhne and a photograph of Ms Trimingham published on the website and in the print edition of the Daily Mail on 1 April, along with the articles they accompanied, and a photograph of Mr Huhne with Ms Trimingham published on the website on 5 May and in the print edition on 6 May, breached Clause 3 (Privacy) of the Editors' Code of Practice.

(23)Mr Chris Huhne and Ms Carina Trimingham  (Daily Mirror)

Mr Chris Huhne and Ms Carina Trimingham complained to the Press Complaints Commission through solicitors that a photograph of Mr Huhne and a photograph of Ms Trimingham published on the website and in the print edition of the Daily Mirror on 1 April, along with the articles they accompanied, breached Clause 3 (Privacy) of the Editors' Code of Practice.

(24)Mr Chris Huhne and Ms Carina Trimingham (Sunday Mirror)

Mr Chris Huhne and Ms Carina Trimingham complained to the Press Complaints Commission through solicitors that a photograph of Mr Huhne with Ms Trimingham, published on the website and print edition of the Sunday Mirror on 6 May, breached Clause 3 (Privacy) of the Editors' Code of Practice.

(25)Gary and Danielle Lineker (The Sun)

Gary and Danielle Lineker complained to the Press Complaints Commission through their legal representatives that The Sun breached Clause 3 (Privacy) and Clause 4 (Harassment) of the Editors' Code of Practice in the course of investigating a story for possible publication.

(26)Stewart Frazer (The Scotsman)

Stewart Frazer complained to the Press Complaints Commission that an article headlined 'Anger at young Hearts fan's banner baiting Hibs', published by The Scotsman on 30 January 2013 on its website, breached Clause 3 (Privacy) and Clause 6 (Children) of the Editors' Code of Practice.

(27)Stewart Frazer (Edinburgh Evening News)

Stewart Frazer complained to the Press Complaints Commission that an article headlined 'A sign of the times?', published by the Edinburgh Evening News on 30 January 2013, breached Clause 3 (Privacy) and Clause 6 (Children) of the Editors' Code of Practice.

(28)Christine Hussain (Herts Advertiser)

Christine Hussain, an Independent Sexual Violence Adviser at the Emerald Centre Sexual Assault Referral Centre, complained on behalf of a client of the Centre to the Press Complaints Commission that an article published in the Herts Advertiser in 2012 included information likely to identify her as a victim of sexual assault, in breach of Clause 11 (Victims of sexual assault) of the Editors' Code of Practice.

(29)Mrs Rosemary MacLeod (The Scottish Sun)

Mrs Rosemary MacLeod complained to the Press Complaints Commission on behalf of the Hoy family that an article headlined 'Tears for Hoy uncle at funeral in Edinburgh', published in The Scottish Sun on 18 November 2012, raised a breach of Clause 5 (Intrusion into grief and shock) of the Editors' Code of Practice.

(30)Norfolk Constabulary (The Sun)

A representative of Norfolk Constabulary complained to the Press Complaints Commission that two articles published in The Sun newspaper on 4 and 5 September 2012 were inaccurate and misleading in breach of Clause 1 (Accuracy) of the Editors' Code of Practice. The complainant also raised concerns that the newspaper had published information obtained in breach of Clause 10 (Clandestine devices and subterfuge) of the Code.



Home ] Cases ] Site map ]